Annual Report 2015 Breeding

Breeding birds

The preamble to this post is copied from last year.  That makes this report more self-contained, which I see as a Good Thing.  

It can be argued that recording breeding events is the most important aspect of bird observation since if the birds do not breed they will soon be extinct!  It is however a more difficult task than simple observation as: 

• many birds go to some lengths to conceal their nests; and
• it is necessary to be very cautious with most species to avoid frightening the birds away from the nest.

To ameliorate these problems a wide definition of breeding is employed with the core events of "nest with eggs" and "nest with young" supported by a range of other, indirect, measures of breeding activity ranging from breeding display to dependent young. (I sometimes feel that a new code is needed for "indolent young" when the Magpie chicks are clearly able to fend for themselves but would rather bludge off their parents.) To be rated as dependent young the fledglings 

• must be out of the nest and generally be seen being fed by the parents or, 
• in the case of waterbirds, be incapable of flight.   

I have made an exception for the Tawny Frogmouths where the fledglings are fed at night and it isn't possible to determine how this is achieved.  In that case the young are considered dependent until they move away from the parents some 10 weeks or so after leaving the nest.

In other countries such as Canada studies are undertaken which assume all birds seen or heard  during the breeding season are in fact breeding.  The International eBird project, run out of the prestigious Ornithology Programme at Cornell U in New York takes a very broad view with codes such as “Singing male” (Possible breeding) and “Agitated Behaviour” (Probable breeding).  Of course, with this wide set it is possible to choose and I shall stick with the set of codes used by COG.

A difficulty with analysis of breeding records is that the peak breeding period in the Southern Hemisphere is split by the change of calendar year.  This is illustrated in the following chart (covering the 9 complete years of the project).

To overcome this I commenced, in mid 2009, recording the 'financial year" in which observations were made and it is possible from that point on to re-categorise observations to a "breeding year" (running from July to June).  

Since this project commenced 764 breeding records have been noted. The decision to use the COG Breeding codes was made in late 2009 and thus approximately 1/6^th of the records are not coded to type of activity.  Such is life, and the uncoded records are excluded from the next chart!  

The percentage of records of each type is shown separately for the last complete 'season (2014-15) and the rest of the records in the chart below.

There is a significantly different distribution of type of activity reported in 2014-15 and the rest of the series.  I think this is mainly due to more people reported birds on nests (code 'on') or nest with young birds (code 'ny').  This is obviously a more definite indication of breeding in the area than dependent young (code 'dy') records since the begging young could have been hatched out of the area.  (Of course ny does not necessarily mean the young survive: we have plenty of Pied Currawongs in the area to predate the nests.

It might be noted that 77% of the records after December are coded as dependent young: this percentage has changed somewhat after adding another year of records, primarily due to several records of active pardalote, honeyeater and finch nests in the New Year.  Presumably these are second broods.

The incidence of type of event x month is illustrated by this chart in which the redder fill indicates a greater number of records).  Somes codes have been grouped to remove the less regularly reported ones.

Following from this, the next section mostly covers 5 breeding seasons ending on 30 June 2015. The 2014-15 season will, inshallah, be reported on next year, but at this stage appears similar to history.

Breeding season	No. records
2010-11	124
2011-12	137
2012-13	105
2013-14	118
2014-15	98

It is difficult to assign reasons for the differences shown in this table - I might try to do a separate post on this later, when feeling particularly masochistic.

Taking the number of species seen in each season the following result is obtained.  My impression is that the number of breeding species is a little more stable that the number of breeding records.  

Breeding season	No. of breeding Species
2010-11	51
2011-12	52
2012-13	49
2013-14	47
2014-15	42

The number of reports received over the 8 calendar years by species is summarised in the following table.

# reports	# species
1	19
2-4	31
5-10	15
11-19	19
20+	10

As expected a large proportion of species have only been reported undertaking breeding activity a few times.  The ten species with 20 or more breeding records are:

• Australian Magpie (57 reports): the swooping of defending adults and the whingeing of the dependent young are hard to ignore, however much one tries.  That being said no-one reported breeding behaviour by  Magpie in 2013-14 - I didn't even get swooped riding my bike!  The situation has returned to normal for 2014-15!
• Tawny Frogmouth (34 reports): Once noticed the nest and parents with dependent young are easy to relocate.  Also the breeding season is 5 months long from the start of nesting to kicking the young out.  
• Pied Currawong (33reports): see Australian Magpie.  There is no way I can miss the {expletives deleted, with regret} pair that nest above our lawn and swoop me every time I walk across it!
• Striated Pardalote (32 reports): a serial offender at building a nest in any apparent hole in a building or tree.  Also very vocal when doing so!  This species re-entered the top list after dropping out in 2012-13
• Willie Wagtail (30 reports): The records for this species cover a wide range of types of "nest-centred" events, possibly reflecting the energetic distraction displays, having the unintended outcome of leading keen observers to the nest (rather than away from it).  No additional breeding records in 2014 -15
• Welcome Swallow (28 reports):  Similar to the previous species but prefers a more open site such as in the rafters of a shed.  
• White-browed Scrubwren (22 reports)  A very active bird and repeated zooming into a bush with a mouthful of grubs attracts attention.
• Australian Wood Duck (22 reports)  A very common bird around farm dams and lawns, in Spring often leading a conga line of ducklings from the nest in tree hollows.
• Yellow-rumped Thornbill (21 reports): Very common species and feeding young often happens out in the open.
• Australasian Grebe (20 reports) Last year I commented that "The score for Australasian Grebe continues to be affected by our top dam being deserted this year, but again the nests were far less obvious around the district.  Is this an impact of the dry period after last Summer?"  I have received a few more reports so they have made the big league.  The young birds are particularly interesting with striped heads.

Links to other sections of this report

Overall picture

Comparison with 2014

Comparison with previous 8 years